- Meade camera adapter canon 3d printer for free#
- Meade camera adapter canon 3d printer full#
- Meade camera adapter canon 3d printer free#
Starting with a wide field scope allows you a lot of forgiveness when it comes to alignment and tracking. The ST80 probably produces round stars, but with fringe because it's an achromat. The ETX-125 is 1905mm, hard for good equatorial mounts, and the AstroView is 750mm, which is pretty long for just the motor drive. One of the reasons you may have found that your stars were struggling was the focal length of your scopes. But again, at this point we're up to $1300 or so spent. You spent $75 to fabricate your own polar camera, which is also something that this sub lists as an option. What's funny is you got it because you wanted live view, but if you had waited until you spent $15 more on camera control software, you would have been fine.
Meade camera adapter canon 3d printer free#
This is probably the amount somebody would have to pay if they didn't luck into a free camera. You weren't satisfied with the Canon XTi so you spent an additional $200 on a T3i. So for the cost of 3 scopes and 2 mounts, we could have spent our money on one good scope and one good mount. This is pretty close to the amount that a SkyGuiderPro and a WO ZenithStar 61II cost together. We're now up to almost $1000 total spent. Moving on further, you made another $50 purchase for another scope. Now, we're an additional $350 in, money that could be spent on astro-modification, a filter, or another lens, perhaps a longer one, or just saved for further upgrades. You spent ~$550 on a telescope+mount but it didn't supply you with what you wanted so you had to spend again. Here's where we see the first real issue crop up with your advice. Let's move on though, you spent another $350 on a Meade ETX-125 + motor drive. Most importantly, this setup is upgradeable and expandable. But instead of a clock drive, you have an actual motorized equatorial mount, and your optics are still diffraction limited for $50-100 more. A kit lens might run you $150 or so or more.
Meade camera adapter canon 3d printer full#
Assuming a person also lucks into a free DSLR, you could spend $450 on an iOptron SkyGuiderPro and the full camera package for the mount (Dec bracket, counterweight etc.). Also, you said you were able to take 30s exposures, but the AstroView doesn't come with a clock drive out of the box, it costs an extra $100.īefore we move on though, let's look at what you could've spent money on. Extension tubes for T-rings aren't that expensive either, so 3D printing may have saved you $50-100 on that end.
Meade camera adapter canon 3d printer for free#
Lucking into a DSLR for free isn't a tip, and the general advice has always been to source a used DSLR to start out, just most people won't be able to find one for free, and will likely still end up paying at least $150. You then say that these 3 tips saved you hundreds of dollars. This is why people caution against plastic focusers. Suddenly, your diffraction limited scope is no longer diffraction limited especially with temperature changes. The general problem with 3D printed parts is that the tolerances aren't super great for astrophotography. That's great, and great that you make your files free, however, it only really works for people who have the same or very similar optical setups to yours. You also designed 3D printed parts to make your scope work with the DSLR. You received a Canon XTi, for free I guess. You purchased an Orion Astroview 6 with mount which is currently $450. You take a different approach (which is fine, but probably not prudent). A lot of people have all of those things already, but purchasing them is a good investment because it's a setup that probably won't need to be replaced as you upgrade. Nebula Photos on YouTube, does a great job at just using a DSLR, kit lens, and tripod (no tracker). That does mean, potentially waiting, but it doesn't have to. Here's why:Ī lot of the advice on budgeting in this hobby boils down to save enough so that you can purchase equipment that you won't have to replace (probably ever). I don't think your way is a terribly good way to go about the hobby, however. However, there are sizable portions of this hobby that are more accessible. I too, think that a large portion of this hobby requires fairly expensive equipment, and that's annoying and unfortunately, unavoidable. I wouldn't call it inflammatory, just smug, especially in a sub about asking questions. So, the other user wasn't saying your excitement was inflammatory, simply your choice of title.